Contact VITEK

Contact us for any questions you might have! We are here for you!

* Required Field

Questions/Comments/Feedback?

I would like to:

Speak with a mortgage loan originator

Schedule a consultation


Mailing Address

VITEK Mortgage Group
Corporate Office

3 Parkcenter Drive
2nd Floor
Sacramento, Ca 95825
Toll Free: (800) 570-5300

Select Your Language:

Customer Login - Coming soon!

You will be able to log in for up-to-the-minute updates on your loan in process and easily submit needed documentation to us to help ensure a faster transaction for you. This new state-of- the-art communication system will also support our efforts toward complete paperless transactions and helps us further our Think Green initiatives!

Team VITEK Blog

Posts Tagged ‘loans’


15% Increase in Values on Homes Under $200,000

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

The median price for homes in the five-county area of Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado, Nevada and Yolo increased 1% from April to May, also representing a 3% increase over the last 12 months in all price-points. Additionally, homes under $200,000 have seen their price-per-square-foot values increase 15% in the last 12 months. “This very large increase is due to an overall inventory shortage as well as record-low interest rates,” stated Michael Lyon, CEO, Lyon Real Estate. “The majority of all sales are occurring under the $300,000 threshold; however, due to significant price-reductions, we are starting to see an increase in sales in the $500,000+ upper-end market.”

TRENDGRAPHIX’s latest report shows that sales increased 6 percent during the month of May for the Tri-County region of Sacramento, Placer and El Dorado Counties. May 2010 sales were the same than May 2009 sales. Pending sales decreased by 10 percent from April to May 2010.

May 2010 inventory of 7,229 homes for sale is 10 percent lower than May 2009 inventory. This is a 53 percent decrease for the regional inventory record high of 15,302 set in August 2007.

COUNTY HIGHS AND LOWS

Sacramento County sales increased 8 percent from April to May 2010. Inventory increased 8 percent during the month of May. Pending sales decreased by 14 percent in the month of May. 55 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 39 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 6 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 2 percent during the month of May to $127.

Placer County sales increased by 5 percent and inventory increased by 1 percent during the month of May 2010. Pending sales increased by 5 percent from April to May. 4 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 51 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 45 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased by 1 percent during the month of May to $149.

El Dorado County sales remained the same from April to May, and the inventory increased by 6 percent from April to May. Pending sales have decreased 11 percent during the month of May. 18 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 50 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 32 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot decreased 1 percent during the month of May to $153.

Yolo County sales increased by 14 percent for May 2010 and the inventory increased by 5 percent. Pending sales decreased 3 percent during the month of May. 22 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 52 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 26 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 3 percent during the month of May to $163.

Nevada County sales have decreased by 15 percent during the month of May, and inventory increased 8 percent. Pending sales decreased by 29 percent. No homes sold for under $200,000; 49 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 51 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased by 4 percent during the month of May to $175.

San Joaquin County sales have decreased by 10 percent during the month of May, and inventory increased by 10 percent in May. Pending sales decreased 9 percent. 36 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 52 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 12 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 2 percent during the month of May to $103.


Tons of Pending Escrows but Closings Slow

Monday, May 10th, 2010

TRENDGRAPHIX’s latest report shows that sales decreased 12% during the month of April for the Tri-County region of Sacramento, Placer and El Dorado Counties; which is 13% lower than April 2009 sales. However, pending sales increased by 34% from March to April 2010.

“Industry experts really have no explanation as to why so many closings were pushed from April into May”, said Michael Lyon, CEO-Lyon Real Estate. “The rate of new sales continues to accelerate, but this increase is not represented in all price-points. When looking at the Months of Inventory per Price Bracket statistics, it shows that lower priced properties have too little inventory and high priced properties have too much.”

Price Months of Inventory based on Closed Sales
0 - $200,000                     2 months
$200,000 - $400,000         3.5 months
$400,000 - $750,000         6.5 months
$750,000 +                       20 months

April 2010 inventory of 6,802 homes for sale is 20% lower than April 2009 inventory. This represents a 56% decrease from the regional inventory record high of 15,302 set in August 2007.

COUNTY HIGHS AND LOWS

Sacramento County sales decreased 15 percent from March to April 2010. Inventory increased 2 percent during the month of April. Pending sales increased by 34 percent in the month of April. 56 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 39 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 5 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 3 percent during the month of April to $125.

Placer County sales decreased by 12 percent and inventory increased by 7 percent during the month of April 2010. Pending sales increased by 30 percent from March to April. 5 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 47 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 48 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased by 1 percent during the month of April to $148.

El Dorado County showed an 8 percent increase in sales from March to April, and the inventory increased by 8 percent from March to April. Pending sales have increased 31 percent during the month of April. 21 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 48 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 31 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 1 percent during the month of April to $154.

Yolo County sales decreased by 1 percent for April 2010 and the inventory increased by 10 percent. Pending sales increased 18 percent during the month of April. 35 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 48 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 17 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 3 percent during the month of April to $160.

Nevada County sales have decreased by 5 percent during the month of April, and inventory increased 7 percent. Pending sales increased by 77 percent. 8 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 49 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 43 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot decreased by 7 percent during the month of April to $170.

San Joaquin County sales have decreased by 10 percent during the month of April, and inventory remained at 1766 in April. Pending sales increased 22 percent. 38 percent of the homes sold for under $200,000; 51 percent of the homes sold for between $200,000 and $400,000; and 11 percent of the homes sold for over $400,000. The average price per square foot increased 2 percent during the month of April to $101.


Questions, Questions, Questions…

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Below are questions often asked of me and answers to them, as found on the IRS web site. As always, since I am not a tax advisor, I will not be held liable to the accuracy of the below information, and I strongly encourage you to seek council from a tax professional.

Q. Does previously inheriting a home and living in it automatically disqualify me as a first-time homebuyer if I buy a different home on or before Nov. 6, 2009?

A. Yes, an ownership interest in a prior principal residence would bar you from being considered a first-time homebuyer. As long as you owned and used the prior home as your principal residence, you are not a first-time homebuyer. There is no exception for taxpayers who did not buy their prior residences. (11/19/09)

Q. If I claim the first-time homebuyer credit in 2009 and stop using the property as my main home before the 36 month period expires after I purchase, how is the credit repaid and how long would I have to repay it?

A. If, within 36 months of the date of purchase, the property is no longer used as your principal residence, you are required to repay the credit. Repayment of the full amount of the credit is due at the time the income tax return for the year the home ceased to be your principal residence is due. The full amount of the credit is reflected as additional tax on that year’s tax return. Form 5405 and its instructions will be revised for tax year 2009 to include information about repayment of the credit. (05/06/09)

Q. If a person does not actually make the payments on a home that’s their principal residence, but the deed and mortgage documents are in their name, can they be considered a first-time homebuyer?

A. Yes. If a taxpayer purchases a home to be used as a principal residence from an unrelated person and has not owned a home within the previous 36 months, the taxpayer is eligible for the first-time homebuyer credit regardless of who makes the mortgage payment. (05/06/09

For more information please visit the IRS website.


Ingrid Pierson
(530) 885-1545
ipierson@teamvitek.com


New Good Faith Estimate (GFE), What Does it Mean to You?

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

New guidelines are changing the way all lenders disclose closing costs to homebuyers. The purpose of the new Good Faith Estimate (GFE) is to level the playing field for borrowers, so they can compare loans simply with apples-to-apples comparisons of loan scenarios. In essence, HUD is working to bring all lenders up to the same standard of excellence in reporting closing costs, estimating realistic fees that a buyer should expect to pay at closing with no last minute surprises. While these changes in guidelines will not be substantial for VITEK as we have always strived to adhere to these principles in accuracy, it is important for you to know what these changes mean to you.

Here are some important facts you should be aware of on how these new guidelines may affect you:

1. All lender fees are consolidated in one line, including processing fees, origination fees, etc. Actual costs cannot change from the original estimate without a material change to the loan requested.

2. When fees are being charged to obtain a lower rate, they are broken out and itemized for ease of comparison to other loan programs.

3. Estimated costs for third party settlement providers will be itemized, when lender chooses the provider. Should actual costs increase more than 10% of the original estimates, the lender is responsible for the difference.

4. Services the buyer may shop and choose can change at settlement without the lender being held accountable if the buyer uses a service provider the lender does not identify with. This includes title charges, homeowner’s insurance, and initial deposits for an escrow account.

You can continue to rely on VITEK to provide you with accurate estimates of closing costs!

Nick Lavoie
(916) 209-6567 ext. 103
nlavoie@teamvitek.com


Fixer-Uppers Made Easy

Monday, December 7th, 2009

Want to buy a home but need more money for desired or required repairs? You now have a solution! The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s FHA Streamline 203(k) loan allows you to finance up to $35,000 more into your mortgage to repair or upgrade the home before you move in.

Whether cosmetic or necessary, you can quickly and easily tap into the additional money needed to afford the home improvements. Even better, the additional funds are included in your mortgage. You only have one loan and rates are the lowest ever!

Of course there are limitations and not every repair qualifies. If you or anyone you know is interested, give us a call. We’ll gladly provide you more information about this special program. Call now and you may be eligible for up to $8,000 in additional government tax credits!


Evelyne Jamet
(916) 486-6926
ejamet@teamvitek.com